The security of personal information on the web has been a concern since the web’s inception. As more and more applications reside in the cloud, so does the data that constitutes your digital life. Recent articles in TechCrunch and GigaOM question the privacy of some of the most ubiquitous online tools. The truth is that the benefits of tools such as Facebook, Google apps, and Twitter outweigh the insecurity of streaming personal data into the cloud. This dynamic has caused users (damn near everyone with a computer and internet connection) to overlook security issues. It is equally beneficial to remember that the success of the Internet is built on the ability to share information with like-minded individuals, not the companies that store that information on their servers.
As electronic communication behavior gets increasingly complex, so does the desire for a unified platform. Take the Google suite as an example; the ever-popular apps enable you to conduct your life within a Google browser window. This is a valuable service but it also means that all of your correspondence, scheduling, documents and contacts are housed on one company’s servers. As we begin to unify our online lives and entrust “the aggregators” with increasingly more personal information, it is important, as consumers to be aware of the protection offered by the gate keepers. One questions we must ask ourselves is, Does the steward of our data have anything to gain from that information?
The emergence of the universal inbox poses a new set of security challenges. If we are consolidating all communication (email, chat, text, voice, social networking, etc) into one place rather than distributing with a number of sites, the measures the company hosting personal information takes to protect that digital gold becomes increasingly important.


